The purpose of this article is to compare crime statistics between Texas LTC and non-LTC holders for AGG ASSAULT AGAINST PUB SERVANT in 2016. AGG ASSAULT AGAINST PUB SERVANT is defined as an intentional, knowing, or reckless attack against a public servant, such as a law enforcement officer, firefighter, or medical worker, that results in bodily injury. It is important to study the relationship between LTC holders and their propensity for criminal behavior, as it can help inform policy decisions related to the regulation and granting of licenses to carry.
The crime statistics for Texas LTC holders in regards to AGG ASSAULT AGAINST PUB SERVANT in 2016 showed 0 convictions among Texas LTC holders, while 161 convictions occurred among non-LTC holders. This data reveals that Texas LTC holders are less likely to be convicted of AGG ASSAULT AGAINST PUB SERVANT than non-LTC holders, with a comparison rate of 0% for LTC holders versus 100% for non-LTC holders.
Factors That May Contribute to the Difference in Crime Statistics Between Texas LTC and Non-LTC Holders
Several factors may contribute to the difference in crime statistics between Texas LTC and non-LTC holders. First, background checks and eligibility requirements for obtaining an LTC may help ensure that only those deemed not to be a danger to society are awarded licenses. Second, training and education for LTC holders may provide additional confidence that they can use their firearms responsibly and make wise decisions when confronted with potentially dangerous situations. Finally, the perception of risk and responsibility among LTC holders may cause them to be more mindful of their actions, as they know law enforcement or other public officials may be nearby and that their actions may be subject to scrutiny.
This article compared the crime statistics between Texas LTC and non-LTC holders for AGG ASSAULT AGAINST PUB SERVANT in 2016 and found that 0 convictions occurred among LTC holders compared to 161 convictions among non-LTC holders. Factors such as background checks, training, and perception of risk and responsibility may contribute to this difference in crime statistics. These findings have implications for the group with the higher percentage, as they suggest that certain policies, such as stringent eligibility requirements and additional training, could help reduce the number of convictions in this category.