Comparing Crime Statistics between Texas LTC and Non-LTC Holders for Assault Against Government Contractor/Emp
This article will analyze crime statistics between Texas License to Carry (LTC) holders and non-LTC holders for Assault Against Government Contractor/Emp in 2016. It will compare the convictions and propose potential factors that may contribute to the difference in the rates of conviction between the two groups.
Definition of Assault Against Government Contractor/Emp
Assault Against Government Contractor/Emp is defined as when a person intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly causes physical injury to a government contractor or employee, which may include threats, attempts, or conspiracy.
Importance of Studying the Relationship between LTC Holders and Crime Statistics
Analysis of crime statistics can help to identify preventative measures and accountability for those who commit crimes. It can also provide a more holistic understanding of the community and the different groups affected by crime.
Crime Statistics Among Texas LTC Holders
In 2016, there were 0 convictions of Assault Against Government Contractor/Emp by Texas LTC holders, while there were 6 convictions of Assault Against Government Contractor/Emp by non-LTC holders. This is a 0% conviction rate among Texas LTC holders compared to a 100% conviction rate among non-LTC holders.
Factors That May Contribute to the Difference in Crime Statistics Between Texas LTC and Non-LTC Holders
Several factors may contribute to the difference in crime statistics between Texas LTC and non-LTC holders. This includes background checks and eligibility requirements for obtaining an LTC, as well as training and education for LTC holders. Additionally, the perception of risk and responsibility among LTC holders may also play a role.
Conclusion
The findings of this article suggest that Texas LTC holders are less likely to commit a crime of Assault Against Government Contractor/Emp compared to non-LTC holders. This could be due to the background checks, eligibility requirements, training and education, as well as the perception of risk and responsibility that LTC holders must adhere to. The implications of these findings suggest that LTC holders are more likely to be law-abiding citizens than those who lack an LTC.
