Comparing Crime Statistics between Texas LTC and Non-LTC Holders for Abandon/Endanger Child without Intent to Return
This article will compare the crime statistics between Texas License to Carry (LTC) holders and non-LTC holders for the crime of Abandon/Endanger Child without Intent to Return in 2018. This type of crime is defined as the intentional or reckless acts of a person who is responsible for the care of a child, that would expose the child to potential physical or emotional harm. The study is important because it raises awareness of the potential differences in the crime rates between these two groups.
Crime Statistics Among Texas LTC Holders
The 2018 crime statistics show that there were 0 convictions of Abandon/Endanger Child without Intent to Return among Texas LTC holders, while there were 4 convictions among non-LTC holders. This results in a 0% conviction rate among LTC holders and a 100% conviction rate among non-LTC holders.
Factors That May Contribute to the Difference in Crime Statistics between Texas LTC and Non-LTC Holders
Some factors that may contribute to this difference in crime statistics include the background checks and eligibility requirements for obtaining an LTC, the training and education for LTC holders, and the perception of risk and responsibility among LTC holders. Background checks are conducted as part of the LTC application process to verify the applicant’s criminal record and mental health history. Additionally, LTC holders are required to attend a training course to learn about gun safety and legal issues. Finally, LTC holders may be more aware of the risks associated with having a firearm and be more responsible in their use.
Conclusion
This article has compared the crime statistics between Texas LTC and non-LTC holders for the crime of Abandon/Endanger Child without Intent to Return in 2018. Texas LTC holders had 0 convictions, while non-LTC holders had 4. Factors that may contribute to the difference in crime statistics include the background checks and eligibility requirements for obtaining an LTC, the training and education for LTC holders, and the perception of risk and responsibility among LTC holders. The implications of the findings are that LTC holders may be more likely to be law-abiding citizens than non-LTC holders.
