The purpose of this article is to compare crime statistics between Texas LTC and non-LTC holders for AGG ASSAULT AGAINST SECURITY OFFICER for 2018. Aggravated assault against a security officer is defined as an intentional and knowingly threat or physical violence against a law enforcement officer, security officer, or other public safety personnel while on duty or in uniform. Examining the differences in crime statistics between LTC and non-LTC holders is important to understand the relationship between the two groups.
In 2018, there were 0 convictions of LTC holders for AGG ASSAULT AGAINST SECURITY OFFICER, compared to 3 convictions among non-LTC holders. This indicates that LTC holders are less likely to commit this crime than non-LTC holders, at a rate of 0% and 100%, respectively.
Factors that May Contribute to the Difference in Crime Statistics between Texas LTC and Non-LTC Holders
Several contributing factors may explain the disparity between Texas LTC and non-LTC holders. These include:
- Background checks and eligibility requirements for obtaining an LTC.
- Training and education for LTC holders.
- Perception of risk and responsibility among LTC holders.
To summarize, this article explored the difference in crime statistics between Texas LTC and non-LTC holders for AGG ASSAULT AGAINST SECURITY OFFICER in 2018. It was found that LTC holders were less likely to commit this crime than non-LTC holders, with 0% and 100% convictions respectively. Factors such as background checks and eligibility requirements, training, and perception of risk and responsibility were found to be potential contributors to the difference in crime statistics. These findings have important implications for the LTC holders, as they indicate that LTC holders are more likely to abide by the laws and regulations associated with their license.