Introduction
The purpose of this article is to compare crime statistics between Texas LTC and non-LTC holders for TERRORISTIC THREAT INTERRUPT PUBLIC PLACE for the year 2018. TERRORISTIC THREAT INTERRUPT PUBLIC PLACE is defined as “knowingly, intentionally, or recklessly making a terrorist threat, as defined by Texas Penal Code Section 22.07, in a public place.” The importance of studying the relationship between LTC holders and crime statistics is to better understand the impact of LTC holders on public safety and to assess whether or not LTC holders are more likely to commit a terrorist threat than non-LTC holders.
Crime Statistics among Texas LTC Holders
In 2018, there were 0 convictions recorded among Texas LTC holders for TERRORISTIC THREAT INTERRUPT PUBLIC PLACE, while there were 206 convictions among non-LTC holders. This amounts to 0% of LTC holders being convicted of TERRORISTIC THREAT INTERRUPT PUBLIC PLACE, versus 100% of non-LTC holders.
Factors That May Contribute to the Difference in Crime Statistics Between Texas LTC and Non-LTC Holders
Several factors may contribute to the difference in crime statistics between Texas LTC and non-LTC holders. These include background checks and eligibility requirements for obtaining an LTC, training and education for LTC holders, and the perception of risk and responsibility among LTC holders.
Conclusion
In summary, this article provided a comparison of crime statistics between Texas LTC and non-LTC holders for TERRORISTIC THREAT INTERRUPT PUBLIC PLACE for 2018. The data showed that 0% of LTC holders were convicted of TERRORISTIC THREAT INTERRUPT PUBLIC PLACE, versus 100% of non-LTC holders. Several factors may contribute to the difference in crime statistics between Texas LTC and non-LTC holders. The findings of this article suggest that LTC holders are more likely to be law-abiding citizens than non-LTC holders and that they are less likely to commit a terrorist threat in a public place.
