Introduction
The purpose of this article is to compare crime statistics between Texas LTC and non-LTC holders for ABANDON ENDANGER CHILD INT/KNOW/RECK/CRIM N for 2019. ABANDON ENDANGER CHILD INT/KNOW/RECK/CRIM N is defined as the intentional, knowing, or reckless endangerment of a child by someone with criminal negligence.
Statistics will be compared to determine if there is a relationship between LTC and crime statistics. Understanding this relationship can help inform public policy and provide insight into the efficacy of LTC laws.
Crime Statistics Among Texas LTC Holders
The crime statistics between Texas LTC and non-LTC holders for ABANDON ENDANGER CHILD INT/KNOW/RECK/CRIM N for 2019 indicate that 0 convictions were obtained for LTC holders, and 565 convictions were obtained for non-LTC holders. This represents a 0% conviction rate for Texas LTC holders and a 100% conviction rate for non-LTC holders.
Factors That May Contribute to the Difference in Crime Statistics Between Texas LTC and Non-LTC Holders
There are a few distinct factors that may contribute to the difference in crime statistics between Texas LTC and non-LTC holders:
- Background checks and eligibility requirements for obtaining an LTC.
- Training and education for LTC holders.
- Perception of risk and responsibility among LTC holders.
Conclusion
This article discussed the crime statistics between Texas LTC and non-LTC holders for ABANDON ENDANGER CHILD INT/KNOW/RECK/CRIM N for 2019. It was found that 0 convictions were obtained for LTC holders, and 565 convictions were obtained for non-LTC holders. This represents a 0% conviction rate for Texas LTC holders and a 100% conviction rate for non-LTC holders.
The findings of this article suggest that LTC holders are more likely to be law-abiding citizens than non-LTC holders. This could be due to the rigorous background checks and eligibility requirements for obtaining an LTC, the training and education for LTC holders, and the perception of risk and responsibility among LTC holders.
The implications of these findings for the group with the higher percentage of convictions (non-LTC holders) are that policy makers should focus on finding ways to help non-LTC holders adhere to the law.
