The purpose of this article is to compare crime statistics between Texas Licensed to Carry (LTC) and non-LTC holders for Aggravated Assault Against a Security Officer (AASO) in 2019. AASO is defined as an intentional and malicious threat of physical harm or force directed at a security officer.
It is important to study the relationship between LTC holders and crime statistics, as it has implications for gun ownership and gun control laws. Understanding if there is a difference in criminal activity between LTC holders and non-LTC holders can help inform policy decisions.
Crime Statistics Among Texas LTC Holders
In 2019, there were 0 convictions of AASO among Texas LTC holders. This is in comparison to 2 convictions for AASO among non-LTC holders. This means that Texas LTC holders have a 0% rate of conviction for AASO, while non-LTC holders have a 100% rate of conviction for AASO.
Factors that May Contribute to the Difference in Crime Statistics Between Texas LTC and Non-LTC Holders
A few factors may contribute to the difference in crime statistics between Texas LTC and non-LTC holders. These include background checks, eligibility requirements, training, education, and the perception of risk and responsibility among LTC holders.
Background checks and eligibility requirements for obtaining an LTC are stringent, and LTC holders must go through an application process before they are allowed to legally carry a weapon. This ensures that those who hold an LTC are more likely to abide by the law since they have gone through this process.
Training and education for LTC holders is also important. In Texas, all LTC holders are required to take an approved LTC class in order to obtain their license. This training emphasizes safety, responsibility, and the law, which may contribute to a lower rate of criminal activity among this group.
Finally, the perception of risk and responsibility among LTC holders may also play a role. Since they have gone through the process of obtaining their license, they are likely to take responsibility for following the laws associated with it. This may create a heightened sense of accountability that helps keep them from engaging in criminal activities.
In conclusion, this article compared crime statistics between Texas LTC and non-LTC holders for AASO in 2019. It was found that LTC holders had a 0% rate of conviction for AASO, while non-LTC holders had a 100% rate of conviction. Factors such as background checks, eligibility requirements, training, education, and the perception of risk and responsibility may be contributing to the lower rate of criminal activity among LTC holders.
The findings of this article have implications for gun ownership and gun control laws. It suggests that LTC holders may be more likely to abide by the law and thus, may not need to be subject to the same regulations as non-LTC holders. This could lead to more relaxed regulations for LTC holders in the future.