Introduction
The purpose of this article is to compare the crime statistics of Texas licensed to carry (LTC) and non-LTC holders for assault against a government contractor/employee in 2019. Assault against a government contractor/employee, as defined by the Texas Penal Code, is an attack or unlawful act appearing to be on the verge of violence against a person who is employed by, or who contracts with, the government of the United States, the state of Texas, or a political subdivision of the state of Texas. Comparing the criminal activity of LTC holders and non-LTC holders can help determine whether the process of obtaining and maintaining a license to carry is effective in deterring crime.
Crime Statistics Among Texas LTC Holders
The crime statistics of Texas LTC holders for assault against a government contractor/employee in 2019 indicated zero convictions, while the same statistics for non-LTC holders showed three convictions. This difference between the two groups results in a zero percent conviction rate for LTC holders, compared to a 100% conviction rate for non-LTC holders.
Factors that May Contribute to the Difference in Crime Statistics Between Texas LTC and Non-LTC Holders
Several factors may contribute to the disparity in the crime statistics between Texas LTC and non-LTC holders. The background checks and eligibility requirements for applying for an LTC are stringent, which could effectively minimize the likelihood of criminal activity among those who possess a license. Additionally, the training and educational courses that are mandatory for obtaining and maintaining an LTC may provide a greater sense of responsibility for firearms owners. Furthermore, the perception that LTC holders may be held to a higher standard of conduct due to their permitted access to firearms may also play a role in the lower crime statistics.
Conclusion
The findings of this article indicate that in 2019, Texas LTC holders had a zero percent conviction rate for assault against government contractor/employee compared to non-LTC holders, who had a 100% conviction rate. The differences between the two groups may be attributed to the background checks and eligibility requirements in obtaining an LTC, the mandatory training and educational courses, and the perception of a higher standard of responsibility for LTC holders. These results suggest that the process of obtaining and maintaining an LTC may be effective in deterring criminal activity.
