Introduction
This article aims to compare crime statistics between Texas license to carry (LTC) holders and non-LTC holders for ASSAULT BI EMPLOYE/CONTRACTOR CIV COM FACILIT in 2019. ASSAULT BI EMPLOYE/CONTRACTOR CIV COM FACILIT is defined as the intentional or reckless infliction of bodily injury on one person by another person, including felony and misdemeanor offenses. Analyzing the relationship between LTC holders and crime statistics is important for gaining a better understanding of public safety and gun control.
Crime Statistics among Texas LTC Holders
In 2019, there were 0 convictions for ASSAULT BI EMPLOYE/CONTRACTOR CIV COM FACILIT among Texas LTC holders, while there were 1 convictions among non-LTC holders. This means that Texas LTC holders had 0% convictions for ASSAULT BI EMPLOYE/CONTRACTOR CIV COM FACILIT and non-LTC holders had 100% convictions for the same offense in 2019. This suggests that LTC holders are more likely to be law abiding citizens than non-LTC holders.
Factors that May Contribute to the Difference in Crime Statistics Between Texas LTC and Non-LTC Holders
There are several factors that may contribute to the difference in crime statistics between Texas LTC and non-LTC holders. Background checks and eligibility requirements are required in order to obtain an LTC in Texas, and this may cause potential criminals to be discouraged from seeking to obtain one. Training and education for LTC holders also may help to create a culture of responsibility and respect for the law among those with an LTC. Finally, LTC holders may also perceive carrying a concealed weapon as an added risk and thus be more likely to follow the law.
Conclusion
This article has provided an analysis of crime statistics between Texas LTC and non-LTC holders for ASSAULT BI EMPLOYE/CONTRACTOR CIV COM FACILIT in 2019. The data suggests that LTC holders are more likely to be law abiding citizens than non-LTC holders, with 0% convictions for the offense compared to 100% convictions among non-LTC holders. Factors such as background checks and eligibility requirements, training and education for LTC holders, and the perception of risk associated with carrying a concealed weapon may all contribute to this difference in the crime statistics.