Introduction
The purpose of this article is to compare crime statistics between Texas LTC (license to carry) and non-LTC holders for TERR THREAT IMP PUB SERV/PUB FEAR SBI/INFLU GV in 2019. TERR THREAT IMP PUB SERV/PUB FEAR SBI/INFLU GV is defined as an act of terror or intimidation that affects public services, public fear, or government influence. The results of the comparison could have implications for the group with the higher percentage of this type of crime. It is important to study the relationship between those with a license to carry and crime rates, as it could affect public safety.
Crime Statistics Among Texas LTC Holders
In 2019, there were 0 convictions of TERR THREAT IMP PUB SERV/PUB FEAR SBI/INFLU GV among Texas LTC holders. This compares to 24 convictions of the same crime among non-LTC holders, representing a 0% conviction rate for LTC holders and a 100% conviction rate for non-LTC holders. This demonstrates that LTC holders are less likely to commit this type of crime than non-LTC holders.
Factors that may contribute to the difference in crime statistics between Texas LTC and non-LTC holders
There are several factors that may contribute to the difference in crime statistics between Texas LTC and non-LTC holders. First, only individuals who meet certain background check and eligibility requirements are able to obtain an LTC, suggesting that those with a license to carry are more likely to obey the law. Second, LTC holders are required to complete a firearms training course and may choose to participate in educational courses on gun safety, both of which could contribute to a higher level of responsibility among LTC holders. Finally, LTC holders may perceive carrying a gun to be a greater responsibility, and therefore the possibility of facing legal repercussions from engaging in criminal behavior is greater.
Conclusion
This article has compared the crime statistics between Texas LTC and non-LTC holders for TERR THREAT IMP PUB SERV/PUB FEAR SBI/INFLU GV in 2019. The results demonstrate that LTC holders are much less likely to commit this type of crime than non-LTC holders, with a 0% conviction rate for LTC holders and a 100% conviction rate for non-LTC holders. Several factors may contribute to this difference in crime statistics, including background checks and eligibility requirements for obtaining an LTC, training and education requirements for LTC holders, and a higher level of perceived responsibility associated with carrying a gun. The implications of these findings are important for public safety, as they suggest that LTC holders may be more law-abiding citizens than non-LTC holders.
